Comparision Of Jack London Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Comparision Of Jack London Essay, Research Paper In Arthur Gordon # 8217 ; s short narrative # 8220 ; The Sea Devil # 8221 ; and in Jack London # 8217 ; s short narrative # 8220 ; To Construct a Fire, # 8221 ; it is clear that in malice of the many differences the two narratives have many more similarities. First, although there are more similarities between the two narratives, there are still many qualities that portray the antithetic nature between the two short narratives. For illustration, when the fisherman ( in Jack London # 8217 ; s narrative ) used his intelligence to get the better of his enemy ; # 8220 ; Merely by utilizing his encephalon could he possible survive, and he called on his encephalon for a solution. # 8221 ; ( 12 ) On the other manus, when the immature adult male ( in # 8220 ; To Construct a Fire # 8221 ; ) panicked when struck by the idea of deceasing, # 8220 ; he was cognizant of the panicked feeling that it caused # 8221 ; ( 364 ) Besides, In # 8220 ; To Construct a fire # 8221 ; the immature adult male did receive advice ; # 8220 ; he knew that he should hold listened to the man. # 8221 ; ( 357 ) Conversely, In # 8220 ; The Sea Devil # 8221 ; the old adult male did non have any advice. Furthermore, In Jack London # 8217 ; s narrative the immature adult male did larn a lesson, but he died ; # 8220 ; Then the adult male drowsed off into what seemed to him the most comfy slumber ever. # 8221 ; ( 365 ) Perversely, the adult male in Arthur Gordon # 8217 ; s narrative learned a lesson ; # 8220 ; He knew one thing. He knew he would make no more casting entirely at dark # 8221 ; # 8230 ; # 8220 ; No, non he. # 8221 ; ( 13 ) Furthermore, In Jack London # 8217 ; s narrative, the secret plan largely took topographic point on land and in the twenty-four hours clip. On the contrary, in Arthur Gordon # 8217 ; s narrative, the secret plan largely took topographic point in H2O and at dark. Besides, in # 8220 ; To Construct a Fire, # 8221 ; the chief character had a knife for a arm ; # 8220 ; With his helpless custodies he could neither pull nor keep his she ath knife. # 8221 ; ( 363 ) In contrast to this, in # 8220 ; The Sea Devil, # 8221 ; the chief character did non hold a arm of any kind. All these differences show that although there may be more similarities, there are still many differences. Second, there are many similarities between the two short narratives. For illustration, in both of the narratives, the old adult male and the immature adult male were lone. This is shown by a twosome of quotation marks: # 8220 ; He knew he would make no more casting entirely at night. # 8221 ; ( 13 ) And in London # 8217 ; s narrative, # 8220 ; he was # 8221 ; ( 357 ) . . . # 8220 ; As he turned # 8221 ; ( 358 ) . . . # 8220 ; He was bound. # 8221 ; ( 359 ) These three quotation marks show that the writer did non m ention another individual, therefore the adult male was lone. Besides, In â€Å"The Sea Devil† and in â€Å"To Build a Fire, † both of the chief characters damaged their custodies. To exemplify this, the quotation mark in â€Å"The Sea Devil, † â€Å"He lifted his other manus and felt the hot blood start instantly.† ( 13 ) And in Gordon’s narrative, † . . . he became cognizant of esthesis in his had. His flesh was burning.† ( 362 ) Furthermore, in London’s narrative, the subject was adult male vs. nature. This is illustrated by the quotation mark, † . . . he came around a bend in the trail and found himself lying in the snow.† ( 364 ) Likewise, in Gordon’s narrative, it is shown by the quotation mark, â€Å" . . . and the H2O would pour into his lungs in one crisp painful daze, and he would be finished.† Furthermore, in â€Å"The Sea Devil, † the chief character was unidentified. His name was non m entioned one time in the full narrative. Similarly, in â€Å"To Build a Fire, † neither was the immature man’s name. Besides, in Gordon’s narrative the old adult male had bad fortune. This is illustrated by the quotation mark, â€Å"He shooting over the side of the skiff as if he had roped a runaway locomotive.† Comparatively, In London’s narrative, this is shown by the quotation mark, â€Å"He was angry, and cursed his fortune aloud.† Furthermore, both narratives had a outstanding carnal figure. In â€Å"The Sea Devil, † it was the Devil Ray and in â€Å"To Build a Fire, † it was the Canis familiaris. Furthermore, in â€Å"To Build a Fire, † the immature adult male made many foolish errors. One of which is illustrated by this quotation mark, â€Å"It was his ain mistake or, instead, his error. He should non hold built the fire under the spruce tree.† Likewise, in â€Å"The Sea Devil, † it is illustrated by the quotation mark, â€Å" . . . he knew, in the split second in which idea was still possible, that those duplicate whirls had been made non by two mullets, but by the flying tips of the elephantine beam of the Gulf Coast.† All these similarities show that the narratives are really similar in many ways. In decision, in # 8220 ; The Sea Devil, # 8221 ; and in # 8220 ; To Construct a Fire, # 8221 ; the narratives had many differences, but many more typical similarities. Both narratives were adult male vs. nature, the character was nameless, the chief character was lone, and many more supports. These all progress my thesis and so, it is clear that in malice of the many differences the two narratives have many more similarities.